<html><head>
<style></style><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="MSHTML 11.00.10570.1001" name="GENERATOR"><title>2026: Surcharge on the housing subsidy contribution in Vienna</title></head>
<body>
<h3>2026: Surcharge on the housing subsidy contribution in Vienna</h3><div>From 2026 % WF for employees and employers is charged in the same way for Vienna 0.75. <br><br> <strong>BVA:</strong> <br>Can be set via EM-master WF-liable. There is a separate legal value. <br>mCBN: WF is settled in a separate item. (With one-time rounding of the WF contribution)<br>Neufg: own deduction for the overall WF-contribution <br><br>== in general, as has been the past, only that the percentage increases in Vienna.<br>mCBN for BVA is reported with 0.75% unless it is overridden using the company master<br><br> <strong>ASVG/VAEB:</strong> <br>A WF obligation has been defined via the tariff group (i.e. if the WF percentage is greater than 0.<br>When it concerns Vienna, an additional surcharge of 0 is required.25% is settled on a separate item, which is to be rounded. This does not exist in the tariff group.<br><br>Neufg: there is a separate deduction for the surcharge <br><br>You have to test all variants of WF available or not available. <br>Examples: unpaid leave, special SI payment, ER takes over EM-share with and without KU/WF,...<br>all examples should be tested with Vienna and "not Vienna".<br></div><div><br> <strong>General:</strong> <br>WF for PUV following months for years greater than/equal to 2026 have to react to the new legal value. The rounding logic to be used depends on the field Insurance.<br><br>The override in the master company index for the year 2026 still applies.<br><br></div>
</body></html>
